Home / Blogs / Google Update: Why You Can’t Pull 100 Results per Query Anymore (And What to Do About It)
Noticed a Sudden Drop in Your Google Impressions?
It’s not just you.
It’s not your strategy.
It’s not even your SEO agency.
It’s Google, and a silent technical shift just changed how the search engine reports your performance.
What’s actually going on: Google has removed support for the &num=100 URL parameter, a tool SEO professionals have used for years to fetch up to 100 search results in a single query.
Though never officially documented, it was widely adopted across tools and strategies. Its quiet disappearance is now reshaping how we track rankings, interpret visibility, and report SEO performance.
If you rely on Google Search Console, keyword tracking tools, or SEO reports, this article will walk through what changed, why it matters, and what you can do about it, particularly if you're running SEO campaigns in markets like India.
Let’s break it all down.
For years, SEO tools, data analysts, and power users added &num=100 to Google search URLs to fetch Google 100 results per page. It was efficient, predictable, and deeply embedded in rank tracking systems.
In mid-September 2025, Google silently disabled support for this parameter.
It wasn’t exactly a feature Google promoted, but it worked, and for many of us, it became part of the workflow. According to search industry reports, Google confirmed that the &num=100 parameter and its removal is part of a broader simplification of result rendering.
Here’s why it mattered:
Agencies found it foundational for tracking at scale and then, suddenly, it was gone.
Now, you can only fetch the default ~10 results per page
This isn’t a “bug.” It’s the new normal.
Right around September 10 to 12, SEO teams started noticing that the &num=100 parameter was no longer working. If you try adding it now, you’ll likely just see the standard 10 results, or nothing changes at all. This has majorly impacted:
Your GSC impressions tanked. Your boss is side-eyeing the quarterly dashboard. You need answers and fast.
Fact: 87.7% of sites lost impressions in Google Search ConsoleGoogle later commented that it had never officially supported this parameter. The deprecation wasn’t a bug. It was intentional. Search Engine Land was among the first to cover it.
Here’s what that means:
Tools that previously surfaced positions 50, 80, or 100 are now showing far less. That doesn't mean those keywords aren’t ranking, it just means you’re not seeing them. This creates a false sense of decline in performance.
Fact: 77.6% of sites lost unique ranking terms.These shifts have been widely reported by independent technical audits and search performance monitoring platforms, which noted consistent impression and visibility drops across affected properties.
There’s no official word from Google on region-specific impact, but based on what we, and some of our peers, are observing from Indian clients, here's a quick breakdown:
Metric | Likely in India | What to Watch |
---|---|---|
Impressions | Significant drop, especially for long-tail keywords ranking beyond page 2 | Compare GSC data from Sept 1–10 vs Sept 11–22, segment by device and country |
Keyword visibility | Decrease, especially in average position >30 | Track total queries and visibility for mid-tier terms |
Avg. position | Likely improves artificially | Cross-check with third-party rank tracking tools |
CTR | Might increase without actual traffic growth | Validate against sessions and clicks in GA4 |
Reports / Benchmarks | MoM and YoY comparisons will be skewed | Add notes to dashboards about post-Sept data shift |
Pro tip: Compare your GSC data from Sept 1–10 with Sept 11–22, then break it down by device and location. That’s where the gaps start showing.
Let’s cut through the noise. Here's what we recommend for SEO managers right now:
Here’s something agencies have made clear: this isn’t a true ranking drop. Your content is still performing, it’s just no longer as visible in tracking tools.
We’ve seen it firsthand with clients. Their high-converting content still brings in traffic. Their leads haven’t slowed. But their “keyword count” is off one-fourth in reports.
This is about visibility limits, not SEO failure.
As soon as this shift became apparent, we adjusted our approach. Here's how we responded:
If you’re not, and you’re struggling to make sense of your data, we’re happy to take a look.
Google taking away the &num=100 parameter is less about your rankings and more about your access to those rankings.
Yes, it complicates reporting. But it also gives you a reason to zoom in on what really matters: actual performance, not vanity metrics.
Instead of asking “How many keywords am I ranking for?”, it might be time to start asking, “Which ones are driving value, and how can I get more of them?”
Feeling unsure about your post-September SEO reports?
Let Verve Media help you recalibrate your reporting, reset your baselines, and optimise your visibility strategy.
No external links. This is your proprietary content and positioning.
Q1: What changed with Google’s &num=100 parameter?
A: Google removed support for the &num=100 parameter, which previously allowed viewing 100 results per query. This Google parameter change limits data depth for Google SERP monitoring and affects rank visibility past page one.
Q2: Does this affect page-one rank tracking accuracy?
A: No. Page-one rank tracking remains accurate. The impact is on deeper rankings, which some SEO agencies previously used to assess long-tail performance.
Q3: Will reporting cadence or update frequency change?
A: Not frequency, but reporting focus may shift. Many digital marketing agencies now emphasise top 20 keywords, CTR, and conversion data post-change.
Q4. Can I still see positions 11–100?
A: Most tools no longer show full Google 100 results unless paginated manually. Access varies based on your platform’s Google SERP monitoring capabilities.
Q5. How do I track beyond page one now?
A: Use a rank tracking tool that supports deeper pagination, or partner with an AI SEO agency focused on Answer Engine Optimisation (AEO) like Verve Media. Prioritise user-visible performance over raw position count.